Grizzlies vs Bulls Preview

The Bulls and Grizzlies find themselves locked in basketball limbo—no hope of a playoff push, no interest in a proper tank, just two battered squads slugging it out on the back end of a brutal back-to-back. If you're searching for meaning in late March, look no further: this game is a test of who still cares enough to run back on defense.

Chicago Bulls

Chicago Bulls

VS
Memphis Grizzlies

Memphis Grizzlies

Saturday, March 28, 2026

Win Probability (BAC Model)

◀60%
—
40%

Moderate Favorite

Competitiveness

7/10

Worth Watching

Viewing Value

6.4

Background Noise

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON
Bulls
Grizzlies
112.5

ORtg

113.0
117.3

DRtg

117.2
102.8

Pace

101.4
-4.7

Net Rtg

-4.2
39.7

Win%

32.9
-4.2

TQS

-4.0
LLWLL
Last 5
LLLLL
B2B (road 3 of 4)
Rest
B2B
Stat visualization


Record 29-44 24-49 Viewing Value 6.4 — Background Noise Game Competitiveness 7/10

Matchup Overview

Neither team is fooling anyone. The Bulls (29-44) limp into Memphis coming off another road loss and sporting a defense made of tissue paper. The Grizzlies (24-49), meanwhile, look like an understaffed rec league squad—about half the roster is either questionable tonight or already on a beach somewhere with a cast. For both sides, it’s less about climbing the standings and more about pride, contract years, and avoiding the next sprained ankle.

Stats Corner

  • Grizzlies have lost 5 straight, getting waxed by an average of 19 points a night.
  • Chicago allows 120.9 points per game, and Memphis isn’t far behind at 119.1.
  • Both squads have a negative Team Quality Score (TQS): Memphis (-4.03), Chicago (-4.23).
  • Bulls’ eFG%: 55.0% (edge over Grizzlies’ 53.4%).
  • Grizzlies’ injury list is a mile long—6 long-term outs and 3 questionable tonight.
  • Memphis’s Defensive Rebound Rate: weak at 67.1%, Bulls a bit steadier at 71.1%.

The Edge & What Could Break It

BAC Model pick: Chicago Bulls. Right now, Chicago has just enough offense and slightly less chaos in the rotation to outlast a depleted Memphis squad.

  • Recent form: Bulls at least managed a win against Houston and hung in vs. Cleveland; Grizzlies have looked uncompetitive for two weeks.
  • Personnel edge: Chicago brings more healthy bodies to a back-to-back, while Memphis’s “active” roster is an ever-shifting science project.
  • Offensive efficiency: Bulls shoot better (eFG% 55.0%) and tend to avoid total offensive collapse, unlike Memphis.

Risks:
– Bulls are on game 3 of a 4-game road trip, which usually saps what little focus a sub-.400 team has left. Fatigue is real here.
– If Nick Richards (elbow) sits again, Chicago’s interior could get cooked by any Grizzly forward who can sprint and breathe simultaneously—never say never at this point in the season.

Confidence tag: BAC sits at 60/40 for Chicago—enough to feel confident, but not enough to bet your lunch money.

The Bottom Line

This isn’t poetry—it’s a slog between the walking wounded. Chicago simply has more warm bodies, fewer game-time decisions, and a functional attack. Take the Bulls to win, but keep your thumb near the “mute” button—background noise is what this one does best.